Independent investigative journalist and science-minded researcher busy inquiring into human origins and the development of formative human cultures.
At the time I thought it was an interesting comment. I can accept that it is entirely possible that ancient people came through at that time. Also, I have found the habitat of these unknown people. I have told many people about the above and the last being the National Geographic. They have all ignored me and if people want to know the truth, then you have research all claims to see if it is fact or not.
So as, to know how the people of this world have advanced to the present day. Thank you for reaching out, I think we spoke long ago. I would be happy to try and be helpful, perhaps you could shoot me an email with some of your favourite examples of artifacts and I will ask a friend to look at them as he is a professional paleontologist. If conclusive evidence of hominids k ya emerges then genetics and archaeology would tend toward non Aboriginal species eg Denisovans who interbred with Sapiens and thus formed the current genetic profile.
Genetic studies of indigenous Australians links them to Homo sapiens who left Africa All extant human population are closely genetically related, which should be no surprise to anyone.
Archaeology Places Humans in Australia ,Years-Ago
However, I think you would need to qualify your statement here because the oldest DNA from Africa is a mere 15, years old, making it difficult to talk about genetic evidence of anything happening in or near Africa anywhere near to kya. Interesting that they have a problem accepting people were there because of lack of bones … yet until recent times it was not uncommon for bodies to be laid on a mat platform on a tree to bleach and feed the birds.
- Accessibility Navigation;
- New archaeological site revises human habitation timeline on Tibetan plateau;
- free web site for finding people?
- Humans in California , Years Ago? Get the Facts!
- anchorage alaska yellow pages hotel motel!
- location of people on there cell phones?
When they are gone, they are gone. There is no history of memorialising.
Archaeology Places Humans in Australia 120,000-Years-Ago
The environment and geology in Australia does not tend to favour human fossils, unlike the African rift valley. There is also the vast size of the continent and the little amount of effort to find human sites, thus far. These problems are further compounded by the distrust that Aboriginal people have when it comes to the scientific community a result of colonial abuses of the recent past and ongoing disputes. There are actually quite a number of sites which provide evidence of human activity , years ago, I have spoken to scientists investigating these sites and we can expect some exciting papers in the future.
A reasonable interpretation of the data would be that other hominids preceded modern humans in Australia, just as they did in Europe, China, the Philippines, Indonesia, etc..
More from News
Australian Aboriginals show some DNA from Denesovians and another hominid, so there could have been some overlap between the arrival of modern humans maybe 60, years ago and other hominids who had arrived much earlier. The current evidence simply does not support the proposition that it is probable that humans have been in Australia for , years. That would require substantial evidence to redefine our understanding of the emergence of modern humans and then their expansion across the world. Current evidence still strongly supports the proposition that modern humans emerged in Africa and first travelled out of Africa less than , years ago.
The assumption had previously been that the migrating humans who arrived in Australia picked up their hominid DNA along their journey from Africa, but with this evidence suggestive of hominids on the Australian continent , years ago it may be that the DNA sharing with other hominids occurred after the arrival of the modern humans.
There is an issue here in first deciding upon what exactly is a modern human, I tend to agree with the view that we really do not see fully anatomically and behaviorally modern humans until after 70, years ago. However, we certainly have Homo sapiens and early modern humans one name used widely spread across Eurasia as far back as those populations existed.
Oldest Evidence of North American Settlement May Have Been Found in Idaho
The evidence placing them outside of Africa prior to , years ago is now overwhelming, with finds from the Levant, Greece, China and elsewhere. This is a fatal problem for recent out of Africa, and one that is gradually becoming more apparent to the interested public. There is simply no way to reconcile the presence of these people within the old paradigm. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Geological Survey could provide state-of-the-art ages for the mastodon bones, based on the relative amounts of uranium and thorium within them.
Which human species came to Britain?
After writing a brief report on the site in for the California Department of Transportation, he turned his attention to his other research projects, including the evolution of baleen whales. The site was entombed in siltstone, a type of sedimentary rock that forms from fine-grained sediments—the sort that would settle out only in very slow-moving, low-energy water.
But the large stones that appear to be rudimentary tools are far heavier than the surrounding particles. One is roughly 30 pounds. The team also provided experimental evidence that hammerstones and anvils make similar fracture patterns in fresh elephant bones, suggesting by analogy that such a process could have been at work at the Cerutti site.
Nor does it fully rule out the possibility that the wear patterns on the stones were a result of rocks bumping against one another in a stream, he says. Andy Hemmings , the lead archaeologist at a site of ancient human habitation in Florida called Old Vero , a g r e e s. These types of tools are missing entirely from the Cerutti site, even though it supposedly dates to a time when hominins were perfectly capable of making sophisticated hand axes.
For the last 25 years, Holen has studied two sites in Kansas and Nebraska that are about 14, to 33, years old. He claims these sites are also bone quarries where humans did not use flaked stone tools, much like the Cerutti site. San Diego Natural History Museum paleontologist Don Swanson points at a rock fragment near a large mastodon tusk fragment.
Not necessarily. And in Brazil, bearded capuchin monkeys have smashed cashews with rocks for at least a hundred generations. However, the fossil record of the Americas lacks a marrow-munching, non-human primate at , years ago. Michael Haslam , an Oxford archaeologist who studies tool use in non-human primates, agrees.
But at least four sister species were living in East Asia around the time, and three would be contenders for crossing into the Americas. Might the tool users have been Homo erectus , our direct ancestors and the earliest known fire-starters? What about Homo neanderthalensis , which had made it to present-day Kazakhstan around the time of the activity at Cerutti? Radioactive dating places the fossil and tools at between , and , years old.
Hershkovitz said the record now indicates that humans probably ventured beyond the African continent whenever the climate allowed it. Reconstructions of the ancient climate records, based on deep sea cores, show that the Middle East switched between being humid and extremely arid, and that the region would have been lush and readily habitable for several periods matching the age of the Misliya fossil. The idea of multiple dispersals is supported by recent discoveries such as the teeth unearthed in China, human fossils in Sumatra from around 70, years ago, archaeological evidence from Northern Australia at 65, years and fossils previously discovered near Misliya dating to 90,, years ago.
The scenario also raises the possibility that the eastern Mediterranean may have acted as a crossroads for encounters between our own ancestors and the various other human species, such as Neanderthals, who had already reached Europe. Scientists have already shown that interbreeding with Neanderthals , whose lineage diverged from our own , years ago, occurred some time in the past 50, years.
However, a recent analysis of DNA taken from a Neanderthal leg bone found in a German cave hinted at much earlier encounters between the two species, dating back more than , years. The new fossil adds plausibility to this theory.